Uta

One Piece Card Game Extra Booster / Memorial Collection #EB03-061foilonepiece

AI grade estimate, not an official grade

Uta front
Uta back

Grade Estimates

PSA
9-10
GEM MINT

Predicted range: 9 - 10

BECKETT GRADING
9.5-10

Predicted range: 9.5 - 10

TAG GRADING · ESTIMATE
9-10
GEM MINT

Predicted range: 9 - 10

No paid service recommended

Best next step

Permanent or structural findings make a restoration referral inappropriate for this public report.

Test grading costs and value

Subgrade Breakdown

9.5

Centering

10

Corners

10

Edges

10

Surface

Measured centering ratios

Front L/R
51/49
Front T/B
52/48
Back L/R
50/50
Back T/B
51/49

Why this card received this estimate

This card presents as a very clean, high-end example with strong centering and no clearly provable wear on corners, edges, or surface. Most suspicious signals are explained by the reflective foil finish and scanner contrast rather than actual damage, leaving the card in Gem Mint territory on the available evidence.

Dominant grade limiter

Centering is the lowest measured condition area in this report.

Condition observations

Centering

9.5

[scan_artifact] Programmatic centering failed with 0.00 confidence, so measurements were overridden and visual assessment used. Front appears very well centered with only a slight top-heavier balance; left-right is essentially even. Back appears centered to the eye with strong symmetry and no obvious diamond cut.

Corners

10

Corners present as sharp and intact on both sides. No corner shows the asymmetric shape change, fibre exposure, or concentrated edge-detection response expected for true wear.

Edges

10

Edges appear crisp on both front and back. No localized chipping, notching, dents, or fibre exposure are clearly supported by the edge-focused views; observed border lightness is consistent with scan contrast rather than wear.

Surface

10

Surface appears clean overall. The front's reflective finish creates processing noise and apparent texture that should not be treated as wear, and no specific localized scratch or indentation is proven across multiple appropriate views.

How the company estimates differ

PSA estimate

Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 10, edges 10, surface 10. The weakest anchoring condition area is corners, edges, surface at 10, anchoring the grade at 10. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 10; our predicted range: 9-10, likely 10.

BGS estimate

Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9.5, corners 10, edges 10, surface 10. The weakest anchoring area is centering at 9.5. Because only one anchoring subgrade is lowest, the BGS final can be at most 0.5 above that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 10; our predicted range: 9.5-10, likely 10.

TAG estimate

Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 950, corners 1000, edges 1000, surface 1000. The weakest anchoring area is centering at 950. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 1000; our predicted range: 950-1000, likely 1000.

Scan confidence: medium

Confidence is reduced slightly because centering measurements were unavailable and the front has a reflective foil finish that creates scanner interference in processed views. However, the original and supporting edge/corner views do not show a concrete wear defect.

Suggested next step

Worth grading if the card has strong market value. PSA and TAG look like the friendliest targets for a top result on this copy, while BGS is more likely to return 9.5 than 10 due to stricter centering/surface standards.

This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.

Likely-case and best-case estimates

Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.

PSA

Likely
10
Best case
10

BGS

Likely
10
Best case
10

TAG

Likely
10
Best case
10

What would need to improve for the next grade?

A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in centering. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering failed with 0.00 confidence, so measurements were overridden and visual assessment used. Front appears very well centered with only a slight top-heavier balance; left-right is essentially even. Back appears centered to the eye with strong symmetry and no obvious diamond cut. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.

Is this card worth submitting?

The highest likely-case AI estimate here is PSA 10. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.

Test your own costs and values

Questions about this report

What is holding back the estimate for Uta?

Centering is the lowest measured condition area. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering failed with 0.00 confidence, so measurements were overridden and visual assessment used. Front appears very well centered with only a slight top-heavier balance; left-right is essentially even. Back appears centered to the eye with strong symmetry and no obvious diamond cut.

How certain is this Uta estimate?

Confidence is reduced slightly because centering measurements were unavailable and the front has a reflective foil finish that creates scanner interference in processed views. However, the original and supporting edge/corner views do not show a concrete wear defect.

What do the grade ranges on this Uta report mean?

The image-based ranges are PSA 9-10, BGS 9.5-10, TAG 9-10. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.

Does this report mean Uta should be submitted?

The highest likely-case AI estimate here is PSA 10. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.

Which grading company looks strongest from this report?

No current CardRevive middleman house has a uniquely higher matching estimate in this report, so the scores alone do not support a single-house recommendation. TAG remains an estimate-only reference, while PCG, ACE and CGC are not estimated by this report.

These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission when the evidence-qualified panel above identifies an appropriate commercial route.

CardRevive may offer some account holders a fixed grading credit for keeping qualifying reports public. Any publication incentive is independent of the estimated grade or report content and may affect which owners choose to publish.

Share this public report

Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.

Download branded graphics

Grade your own card

Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.

Grade yours free — 3 grades included

Your privacy choices

Essential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.

Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.

Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.