AI grade estimate, not an official grade
Predicted range: 8 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
No paid service recommended
Permanent or structural findings make a restoration referral inappropriate for this public report.
Test grading costs and value9.5
Centering
10
Corners
10
Edges
9.5
Surface
Measured centering ratios
This card presents extremely clean overall with sharp corners, strong edges, and excellent centering on both sides by visual review. The only notable issue is a faint localized front surface line in the lower-center area, which appears minor but likely keeps it just below a universal perfect grade.
Dominant grade limiter
Centering and Surface are the lowest measured condition areas in this report.
[scan_artifact] Programmatic centering data was unusable (confidence 0.00), so visual assessment was used. Front appears very well centered with only a slight left-right preference at most; top-bottom looks essentially even. Back centering appears strong and symmetrical in both axes. No visible diamond cut or obvious misalignment.
Small light rims visible around some corners are consistent across multiple corners and align with scanner contrast rather than true damage. No definite corner ding, fray, bend, splitting, or exposed stock is confirmed on either side. Overall corners present as sharp and gem-level.
Apparent edge lightening is largely uniform and attributable to scanner contrast on bordered edges. No isolated nick, chip, notch, dent, or layering is definitively supported across the original, edge detection, inverted, and edge map views. Edges appear clean overall.
Surface is largely clean, but the front shows one minor localized linear disturbance in the lower-center area that looks like a small surface scratch/pressure-line level flaw. No other clear wear defects are confirmed. This is the only issue that meaningfully threatens a perfect overall grade.
Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 10, edges 10, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring condition area is surface at 9.5, anchoring the grade at 9. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 9; our predicted range: 8-10, likely 9.
Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9.5, corners 10, edges 10, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring area is centering, surface at 9.5. Because multiple anchoring subgrades share the lowest score, the BGS final equals that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 9.5; our predicted range: 9-10, likely 9.5.
Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 950, corners 1000, edges 1000, surface 950. The weakest anchoring area is centering, surface at 950. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 950; our predicted range: 900-1000, likely 950.
Confidence is reduced slightly because centering measurements were unavailable and flatbed-style scans limit certainty on very fine surface defects. Corners and edges are high-confidence clean; the key uncertainty is whether the front lower-center line is treated as a true wear defect or benign production/surface texture.
Worth grading if this is a desirable card, as it appears high-end mint. PSA offers a realistic shot at a 9 with outside 10 upside; BGS may be attractive if you value subgrades, as the card could still land 9.5 despite one minor surface issue.
This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.
Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.
Condition-only company signal: BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in centering and surface. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering data was unusable (confidence 0.00), so visual assessment was used. Front appears very well centered with only a slight left-right preference at most; top-bottom looks essentially even. Back centering appears strong and symmetrical in both axes. No visible diamond cut or obvious misalignment. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
Test your own costs and valuesCentering and Surface are the lowest measured condition areas. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering data was unusable (confidence 0.00), so visual assessment was used. Front appears very well centered with only a slight left-right preference at most; top-bottom looks essentially even. Back centering appears strong and symmetrical in both axes. No visible diamond cut or obvious misalignment.
Confidence is reduced slightly because centering measurements were unavailable and flatbed-style scans limit certainty on very fine surface defects. Corners and edges are high-confidence clean; the key uncertainty is whether the front lower-center line is treated as a true wear defect or benign production/surface texture.
The image-based ranges are PSA 8-10, BGS 9-10, TAG 9-10. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission when the evidence-qualified panel above identifies an appropriate commercial route.
CardRevive may offer some account holders a fixed grading credit for keeping qualifying reports public. Any publication incentive is independent of the estimated grade or report content and may affect which owners choose to publish.
Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.
Download branded graphics
Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.
Grade yours free — 3 grades includedEssential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.
Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.
Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.