AI grade estimate, not an official grade
Predicted range: 8 - 10
Predicted range: 8.5 - 9.5
Predicted range: 8 - 9
Your next step
When you are ready to act on this estimate, submit through CardRevive. Choose a professional grading service below and CardRevive will coordinate the submission as your independent grading middleman and submission partner. CardRevive operates this AI grader and the separate middleman service; the selected grading house, not CardRevive, issues the official grade.
United States
From A$172 AUD
per card
United States
From A$55 AUD
per card
Australia
From A$30 AUD
per card
United Kingdom
From A$60 AUD
per card
United States
From A$40 AUD
per card
This AI report estimates PSA, BGS and a TAG-style result. TAG is estimate-only and is not a currently listed CardRevive middleman service. PCG, ACE and CGC are available through CardRevive, but this report does not provide house-specific AI estimates for them.
Starting prices are per card in AUD and were effective 11 July 2026. CardRevive is independent and is not affiliated with the listed grading companies. Final fees and timing are confirmed before dispatch; grading turnaround excludes restoration, and restoration or grading may incur upcharges. Only the selected grading house issues the official grade, and no outcome is guaranteed.
9.5
Centering
9.5
Corners
9
Edges
9
Surface
Measured centering ratios
This card has strong eye appeal and very good centering, but it is not a mint-level copy under grading standards. Multiple small corner and edge wear points are present, and the front has a visible vertical surface defect with a couple of small spots on the back.
Dominant grade limiter
Edges and Surface are the lowest measured condition areas in this report.
[scan_artifact] Programmatic centering was ignored because contour confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Visual assessment used instead. Front appears very well centered with only a slight top-heavier presentation and near-even left-right borders. Back appears essentially centered with no meaningful misalignment visible.
All four corners remain sharp overall, but both original and close-up views show small localized corner touches on multiple corners front and back, with the back bottom-left and front top-right/bottom-left the easiest to confirm. These are real minor wear defects rather than uniform scan fringe because they are localized at the tips and recur across supporting views.
Edges are generally solid but not gem-clean. Multiple small isolated edge nicks/whitening points are visible on both sides, with the front left edge and back lower/left border showing the strongest evidence. This is enough to pull the edge assessment below gem level, though the wear remains light overall.
Surface presents clean overall but not flawless. The front has a visible vertical line/disruption along the left side that appears to be a real surface defect, and the back shows one noticeable small dark spot plus a tiny additional pinpoint mark. No convincing creases, dents, or major scratches are confirmed.
Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 9.5, edges 9, surface 9. The weakest anchoring condition area is edges, surface at 9, anchoring the grade at 9. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 9; our predicted range: 8-10, likely 9.
Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9.5, corners 9.5, edges 9, surface 9. The weakest anchoring area is edges, surface at 9. Because multiple anchoring subgrades share the lowest score, the BGS final equals that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 9; our predicted range: 8.5-9.5, likely 9.
Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 950, corners 950, edges 900, surface 900. The weakest anchoring area is edges, surface at 900. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 900; our predicted range: 850-950, likely 900.
Confidence is moderate because centering had to be judged visually due to failed contour measurements, and flatbed-style processed views can exaggerate texture/noise. However, the main wear calls are supported across the original and multiple processed views.
Worth grading if the card has strong collector value as a Japanese promo, but it should be submitted with expectations around PSA 8 / BGS 8.0 rather than gem mint. PSA is likely the most favorable path due to strong centering and simpler overall-grade presentation.
This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.
Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.
A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in edges and surface. Edges are generally solid but not gem-clean. Multiple small isolated edge nicks/whitening points are visible on both sides, with the front left edge and back lower/left border showing the strongest evidence. This is enough to pull the edge assessment below gem level, though the wear remains light overall. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is PSA 9. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
Test your own costs and valuesThe report mentions presentation wear that a card-restoration specialist could assess. Some wear is permanent, and no treatment should be assumed to raise an official grade.
Ask CardRevive about a specialist assessmentEdges and Surface are the lowest measured condition areas. Edges are generally solid but not gem-clean. Multiple small isolated edge nicks/whitening points are visible on both sides, with the front left edge and back lower/left border showing the strongest evidence. This is enough to pull the edge assessment below gem level, though the wear remains light overall.
Confidence is moderate because centering had to be judged visually due to failed contour measurements, and flatbed-style processed views can exaggerate texture/noise. However, the main wear calls are supported across the original and multiple processed views.
The image-based ranges are PSA 8-10, BGS 8.5-9.5, TAG 8-9. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is PSA 9. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
No current CardRevive middleman house has a uniquely higher matching estimate in this report, so the scores alone do not support a single-house recommendation. TAG remains an estimate-only reference, while PCG, ACE and CGC are not estimated by this report.
These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission for the professional services listed above.
Graded 18 March 2026
Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.
Download branded graphics
Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.
Grade yours free — 3 grades includedEssential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.
Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.
Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.