AI grade estimate, not an official grade
Predicted range: 8 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
Evidence-qualified next step
The report documents corner or edge presentation wear that may warrant specialist inspection. Suitability, grading-company acceptance and a higher grade are not guaranteed.
View restoration assessment criteria (opens in a new tab)CardRevive operates this Grader and the linked commercial restoration service. The image-based estimate cannot promise treatment safety, grading-company acceptance, an official grade, turnaround or financial return.
9.5
Centering
9.5
Corners
9
Edges
9.5
Surface
Measured centering ratios
This card has strong eye appeal and presents as a clean high-grade copy. Centering is solid, surface is largely clean, and the main limitations are a cluster of tiny edge and corner touches rather than any major defect. Overall it looks like a Mint card with a realistic ceiling below Gem Mint due to multiple small wear points.
Dominant grade limiter
Edges is the lowest measured condition area in this report.
[scan_artifact] Programmatic centering measurements were unavailable with 0.00 confidence, so measurement override was applied and visual assessment used. Front appears slightly right-heavy and very slightly bottom-heavy but comfortably within Gem Mint tolerance. Back also appears mildly right-heavy and bottom-heavy, still well within all major top-grade thresholds for this card type.
Overall corners are strong and present as sharp. There are a few minor localized back-corner touches plus a tiny front top-right touch, but no heavy fraying, bends, splitting, or rounding. This profiles as Mint/Gem Mint corner quality rather than pristine.
Edges are generally clean but not flawless. The front dark border creates some false whitening impression, yet cross-reference supports a handful of genuine tiny nicks/touches, especially on the back blue border and a small front lower-edge nick. No dents, layering, or major chipping seen.
Surface presents clean overall with no major holo scratching, creases, dents, or staining visible in the provided scans. Only very minor possible specking/light superficial interruption is noted, keeping the surface in high Mint territory.
Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 9.5, edges 9, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring condition area is edges at 9, anchoring the grade at 9. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 9; our predicted range: 8-10, likely 9.
Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9.5, corners 9.5, edges 9, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring area is edges at 9. Because only one anchoring subgrade is lowest, the BGS final can be at most 0.5 above that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 9.5; our predicted range: 9-10, likely 9.5.
Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 950, corners 950, edges 900, surface 950. The weakest anchoring area is edges at 900. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 950; our predicted range: 900-1000, likely 950.
Confidence is moderate because the scan set lacks the dedicated edge-strip close-ups and contour boundary view, and this glossy dark-bordered full-art card is prone to scanner contrast artifacts. Surface micro-scratches may also be underrepresented in flat scans, so only clearly cross-supported wear was counted.
Worth grading if the card has strong value raw-to-PSA 9, but I would not submit expecting a 10. PSA is likely the best fit because centering is fine and PSA is generally more forgiving on back centering than other companies; BGS/TAG are likely to expose the minor edge/corner defects more clearly.
This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.
Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.
Condition-only company signal: BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in edges. Edges are generally clean but not flawless. The front dark border creates some false whitening impression, yet cross-reference supports a handful of genuine tiny nicks/touches, especially on the back blue border and a small front lower-edge nick. No dents, layering, or major chipping seen. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
Test your own costs and valuesEdges is the lowest measured condition area. Edges are generally clean but not flawless. The front dark border creates some false whitening impression, yet cross-reference supports a handful of genuine tiny nicks/touches, especially on the back blue border and a small front lower-edge nick. No dents, layering, or major chipping seen.
Confidence is moderate because the scan set lacks the dedicated edge-strip close-ups and contour boundary view, and this glossy dark-bordered full-art card is prone to scanner contrast artifacts. Surface micro-scratches may also be underrepresented in flat scans, so only clearly cross-supported wear was counted.
The image-based ranges are PSA 8-10, BGS 9-10, TAG 9-10. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission when the evidence-qualified panel above identifies an appropriate commercial route.
CardRevive may offer some account holders a fixed grading credit for keeping qualifying reports public. Any publication incentive is independent of the estimated grade or report content and may affect which owners choose to publish.
Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.
Download branded graphics
Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.
Grade yours free — 3 grades includedEssential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.
Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.
Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.