AI grade estimate, not an official grade
Predicted range: 8 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
Your next step
When you are ready to act on this estimate, submit through CardRevive. Choose a professional grading service below and CardRevive will coordinate the submission as your independent grading middleman and submission partner. CardRevive operates this AI grader and the separate middleman service; the selected grading house, not CardRevive, issues the official grade.
United States
From A$172 AUD
per card
United States
From A$55 AUD
per card
Australia
From A$30 AUD
per card
United Kingdom
From A$60 AUD
per card
United States
From A$40 AUD
per card
This AI report estimates PSA, BGS and a TAG-style result. TAG is estimate-only and is not a currently listed CardRevive middleman service. PCG, ACE and CGC are available through CardRevive, but this report does not provide house-specific AI estimates for them.
Starting prices are per card in AUD and were effective 11 July 2026. CardRevive is independent and is not affiliated with the listed grading companies. Final fees and timing are confirmed before dispatch; grading turnaround excludes restoration, and restoration or grading may incur upcharges. Only the selected grading house issues the official grade, and no outcome is guaranteed.
9.5
Centering
10
Corners
10
Edges
9.5
Surface
Measured centering ratios
This card presents extremely well overall, with sharp corners, clean edges, and strong visual centering on both front and back. The only believable issue is faint horizontal surface banding visible across the card, which keeps it in Mint territory rather than clear Gem Mint certainty.
Dominant grade limiter
Centering and Surface are the lowest measured condition areas in this report.
[scan_artifact] Programmatic centering data had 0.00 confidence and was ignored. Visual assessment only. Front appears very well centered with a slightly fuller top border than bottom and near-even left/right framing. Back appears essentially centered both left/right and top/bottom. No visible diamond cut or meaningful skew.
[scan_artifact] Corner close-ups show small light fringes typical of scanner contrast on dark borders, but there is no localized fibre exposure, shape deformation, fraying, or dinging confirmed by edge detection or inverted views. All eight corners present as sharp and consistent with pack-fresh condition.
[scan_artifact] The dark back border creates apparent edge lightening in the original image, but it is broadly uniform and not corroborated as localized wear in the proof views. [wear] No clear edge nicks, chips, dents, fraying, or layering were identified on either side.
[wear] The only credible defect is a light, uniform horizontal surface banding visible on both front and back, consistent with a minor surface flaw. No other definite wear defects are proven across the multi-view set.
Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 10, edges 10, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring condition area is surface at 9.5, anchoring the grade at 9. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 9; our predicted range: 8-10, likely 9.
Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9.5, corners 10, edges 10, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring area is centering, surface at 9.5. Because multiple anchoring subgrades share the lowest score, the BGS final equals that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 9.5; our predicted range: 9-10, likely 9.5.
Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 950, corners 1000, edges 1000, surface 950. The weakest anchoring area is centering, surface at 950. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 950; our predicted range: 900-1000, likely 950.
Confidence is reduced slightly because centering had to be estimated visually after contour failure, and flatbed-style scans can make subtle surface lines difficult to classify with complete certainty. Confidence is higher on corners and edges, where multiple views consistently show a clean result.
The card is still worth grading, especially if submitted where mint/gem thresholds are not overly punitive on subtle surface lines. BGS looks like the best fit for label outcome potential, while PSA is more likely to return a 9 unless the surface banding is ignored.
This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.
Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.
Condition-only company signal: BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in centering and surface. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering data had 0.00 confidence and was ignored. Visual assessment only. Front appears very well centered with a slightly fuller top border than bottom and near-even left/right framing. Back appears essentially centered both left/right and top/bottom. No visible diamond cut or meaningful skew. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
Test your own costs and valuesThe report mentions presentation wear that a card-restoration specialist could assess. Some wear is permanent, and no treatment should be assumed to raise an official grade.
Ask CardRevive about a specialist assessmentCentering and Surface are the lowest measured condition areas. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering data had 0.00 confidence and was ignored. Visual assessment only. Front appears very well centered with a slightly fuller top border than bottom and near-even left/right framing. Back appears essentially centered both left/right and top/bottom. No visible diamond cut or meaningful skew.
Confidence is reduced slightly because centering had to be estimated visually after contour failure, and flatbed-style scans can make subtle surface lines difficult to classify with complete certainty. Confidence is higher on corners and edges, where multiple views consistently show a clean result.
The image-based ranges are PSA 8-10, BGS 9-10, TAG 9-10. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission for the professional services listed above.
Graded 18 March 2026
Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.
Download branded graphics
Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.
Grade yours free — 3 grades includedEssential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.
Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.
Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.