AI grade estimate, not an official grade
Predicted range: 8 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
No paid service recommended
Permanent or structural findings make a restoration referral inappropriate for this public report.
Test grading costs and value9.5
Centering
10
Corners
10
Edges
9.5
Surface
Measured centering ratios
This card presents extremely well overall, with sharp corners, clean edges, and strong visual centering on both front and back. The only believable issue is faint horizontal surface banding visible across the card, which keeps it in Mint territory rather than clear Gem Mint certainty.
Dominant grade limiter
Centering and Surface are the lowest measured condition areas in this report.
[scan_artifact] Programmatic centering data had 0.00 confidence and was ignored. Visual assessment only. Front appears very well centered with a slightly fuller top border than bottom and near-even left/right framing. Back appears essentially centered both left/right and top/bottom. No visible diamond cut or meaningful skew.
Corner close-ups show small light fringes typical of scanner contrast on dark borders, but there is no localized fibre exposure, shape deformation, fraying, or dinging confirmed by edge detection or inverted views. All eight corners present as sharp and consistent with pack-fresh condition.
The dark back border creates apparent edge lightening in the original image, but it is broadly uniform and not corroborated as localized wear in the proof views. No clear edge nicks, chips, dents, fraying, or layering were identified on either side.
The only credible defect is a light, uniform horizontal surface banding visible on both front and back, consistent with a minor surface flaw. No other definite wear defects are proven across the multi-view set.
Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 10, edges 10, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring condition area is surface at 9.5, anchoring the grade at 9. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 9; our predicted range: 8-10, likely 9.
Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9.5, corners 10, edges 10, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring area is centering, surface at 9.5. Because multiple anchoring subgrades share the lowest score, the BGS final equals that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 9.5; our predicted range: 9-10, likely 9.5.
Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 950, corners 1000, edges 1000, surface 950. The weakest anchoring area is centering, surface at 950. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 950; our predicted range: 900-1000, likely 950.
Confidence is reduced slightly because centering had to be estimated visually after contour failure, and flatbed-style scans can make subtle surface lines difficult to classify with complete certainty. Confidence is higher on corners and edges, where multiple views consistently show a clean result.
The card is still worth grading, especially if submitted where mint/gem thresholds are not overly punitive on subtle surface lines. BGS looks like the best fit for label outcome potential, while PSA is more likely to return a 9 unless the surface banding is ignored.
This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.
Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.
Condition-only company signal: BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in centering and surface. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering data had 0.00 confidence and was ignored. Visual assessment only. Front appears very well centered with a slightly fuller top border than bottom and near-even left/right framing. Back appears essentially centered both left/right and top/bottom. No visible diamond cut or meaningful skew. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
Test your own costs and valuesCentering and Surface are the lowest measured condition areas. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering data had 0.00 confidence and was ignored. Visual assessment only. Front appears very well centered with a slightly fuller top border than bottom and near-even left/right framing. Back appears essentially centered both left/right and top/bottom. No visible diamond cut or meaningful skew.
Confidence is reduced slightly because centering had to be estimated visually after contour failure, and flatbed-style scans can make subtle surface lines difficult to classify with complete certainty. Confidence is higher on corners and edges, where multiple views consistently show a clean result.
The image-based ranges are PSA 8-10, BGS 9-10, TAG 9-10. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission when the evidence-qualified panel above identifies an appropriate commercial route.
CardRevive may offer some account holders a fixed grading credit for keeping qualifying reports public. Any publication incentive is independent of the estimated grade or report content and may affect which owners choose to publish.
Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.
Download branded graphics
Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.
Grade yours free — 3 grades includedEssential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.
Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.
Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.