AI grade estimate, not an official grade
Predicted range: 8 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
Your next step
When you are ready to act on this estimate, submit through CardRevive. Choose a professional grading service below and CardRevive will coordinate the submission as your independent grading middleman and submission partner. CardRevive operates this AI grader and the separate middleman service; the selected grading house, not CardRevive, issues the official grade.
United States
From A$172 AUD
per card
United States
From A$55 AUD
per card
Australia
From A$30 AUD
per card
United Kingdom
From A$60 AUD
per card
United States
From A$40 AUD
per card
This AI report estimates PSA, BGS and a TAG-style result. TAG is estimate-only and is not a currently listed CardRevive middleman service. PCG, ACE and CGC are available through CardRevive, but this report does not provide house-specific AI estimates for them.
Starting prices are per card in AUD and were effective 11 July 2026. CardRevive is independent and is not affiliated with the listed grading companies. Final fees and timing are confirmed before dispatch; grading turnaround excludes restoration, and restoration or grading may incur upcharges. Only the selected grading house issues the official grade, and no outcome is guaranteed.
9.5
Centering
10
Corners
10
Edges
9.5
Surface
Measured centering ratios
This is a very clean foil card with sharp corners, clean edges, and strong visual centering on both sides. The only meaningful condition concern is a faint shallow surface line on the back, which likely keeps it just short of a guaranteed top grade. Overall it presents as a high-end Mint to Gem Mint candidate.
Dominant grade limiter
Centering and Surface are the lowest measured condition areas in this report.
[scan_artifact] Programmatic centering was ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Visual assessment used instead. Front appears slightly top-heavy and a touch right-leaning but comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances. Back appears essentially centered with only negligible top/bottom variance.
All eight corners present as sharp and structurally intact across original, edge detection, corner close-ups, and inverted views. [scan_artifact] Any apparent whitening is uniform dark-border contrast rather than asymmetric corner wear. No confirmed [wear] on any corner.
Edges are clean on both sides. [scan_artifact] The dark perimeter creates uniform apparent whitening in some views, but edge detection, inverted, and close-up evidence do not show localised exposed fibre or chipping. No confirmed [wear] along any edge.
Surface is overall very strong, but there is one genuine minor wear issue: a faint shallow scratch/line on the back right-of-center, with a possible extremely subtle companion disturbance on the front upper field. No indentations, creases, staining, or major scratching observed. Manufacturing foil characteristics were not penalized.
Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 10, edges 10, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring condition area is surface at 9.5, anchoring the grade at 9. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 9; our predicted range: 8-10, likely 9.
Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9.5, corners 10, edges 10, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring area is centering, surface at 9.5. Because multiple anchoring subgrades share the lowest score, the BGS final equals that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 9.5; our predicted range: 9-10, likely 9.5.
Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 950, corners 1000, edges 1000, surface 950. The weakest anchoring area is centering, surface at 950. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 950; our predicted range: 900-1000, likely 950.
Confidence is medium because centering had to be assessed visually due to failed contour measurements, and flatbed scans have limitations for ultra-fine foil surface evaluation. Surface call is supported across multiple views, but in-hand angled lighting could shift the outcome between a top-end 9 and low-end 10.
Worth grading if the card has strong value. BGS may offer the best chance at a 9.5-style result thanks to strong corners/edges/centering, while PSA is most likely a 9 unless the faint back line is missed. If submitting, use a fresh sleeve/card saver and avoid additional surface contact.
This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.
Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.
Condition-only company signal: BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in centering and surface. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering was ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Visual assessment used instead. Front appears slightly top-heavy and a touch right-leaning but comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances. Back appears essentially centered with only negligible top/bottom variance. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
Test your own costs and valuesThe report mentions presentation wear that a card-restoration specialist could assess. Some wear is permanent, and no treatment should be assumed to raise an official grade.
Ask CardRevive about a specialist assessmentCentering and Surface are the lowest measured condition areas. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering was ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Visual assessment used instead. Front appears slightly top-heavy and a touch right-leaning but comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances. Back appears essentially centered with only negligible top/bottom variance.
Confidence is medium because centering had to be assessed visually due to failed contour measurements, and flatbed scans have limitations for ultra-fine foil surface evaluation. Surface call is supported across multiple views, but in-hand angled lighting could shift the outcome between a top-end 9 and low-end 10.
The image-based ranges are PSA 8-10, BGS 9-10, TAG 9-10. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission for the professional services listed above.
Graded 18 March 2026
Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.
Download branded graphics
Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.
Grade yours free — 3 grades includedEssential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.
Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.
Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.