Dorothy

UNION ARENA / NIKKE #PC02BT/NIK-2-019foilother

AI grade estimate, not an official grade

Dorothy front
Dorothy back

Grade Estimates

PSA
8-10
MINT

Predicted range: 8 - 10

BECKETT GRADING
9-10

Predicted range: 9 - 10

TAG GRADING · ESTIMATE
9-10
MINT

Predicted range: 9 - 10

Evidence-qualified next step

Review professional submission options

This condition-only result is submission-ready enough to compare professional services. The card owner should verify value, fees and risk before acting.

  • PSA

    United States

    From A$172 AUD

  • BGS

    United States

    From A$55 AUD

  • PCG

    CardRevive exclusive

    Australia

    From A$30 AUD

  • ACE

    United Kingdom

    From A$60 AUD

  • CGC

    United States

    From A$40 AUD

Starting prices are per card in AUD, effective 11 July 2026. Final fees, declared-value charges, shipping, insurance, timing and any upcharges are confirmed before dispatch.

TAG is estimate-only and is not a currently listed CardRevive middleman service. PCG, ACE and CGC are available through CardRevive, but this report does not provide house-specific AI estimates for them.

Review professional grading options (opens in a new tab)

CardRevive operates this Grader and the linked commercial middleman service; it is independent of the grading companies. The image-based estimate cannot promise treatment safety, grading-company acceptance, an official grade, turnaround or financial return.

Subgrade Breakdown

9.5

Centering

10

Corners

10

Edges

9.5

Surface

Measured centering ratios

Front L/R
51/49
Front T/B
52/48
Back L/R
50/50
Back T/B
51/49

Why this card received this estimate

This is a very clean foil card with sharp corners, clean edges, and strong visual centering on both sides. The only meaningful condition concern is a faint shallow surface line on the back, which likely keeps it just short of a guaranteed top grade. Overall it presents as a high-end Mint to Gem Mint candidate.

Dominant grade limiter

Centering and Surface are the lowest measured condition areas in this report.

Condition observations

Centering

9.5

[scan_artifact] Programmatic centering was ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Visual assessment used instead. Front appears slightly top-heavy and a touch right-leaning but comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances. Back appears essentially centered with only negligible top/bottom variance.

Corners

10

All eight corners present as sharp and structurally intact across original, edge detection, corner close-ups, and inverted views. Any apparent whitening is uniform dark-border contrast rather than asymmetric corner wear. No confirmed on any corner.

Edges

10

Edges are clean on both sides. The dark perimeter creates uniform apparent whitening in some views, but edge detection, inverted, and close-up evidence do not show localised exposed fibre or chipping. No confirmed along any edge.

Surface

9.5

Surface is overall very strong, but there is one genuine minor wear issue: a faint shallow scratch/line on the back right-of-center, with a possible extremely subtle companion disturbance on the front upper field. No indentations, creases, staining, or major scratching observed. Manufacturing foil characteristics were not penalized.

How the company estimates differ

PSA estimate

Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 10, edges 10, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring condition area is surface at 9.5, anchoring the grade at 9. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 9; our predicted range: 8-10, likely 9.

BGS estimate

Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9.5, corners 10, edges 10, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring area is centering, surface at 9.5. Because multiple anchoring subgrades share the lowest score, the BGS final equals that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 9.5; our predicted range: 9-10, likely 9.5.

TAG estimate

Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 950, corners 1000, edges 1000, surface 950. The weakest anchoring area is centering, surface at 950. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 950; our predicted range: 900-1000, likely 950.

Scan confidence: medium

Confidence is medium because centering had to be assessed visually due to failed contour measurements, and flatbed scans have limitations for ultra-fine foil surface evaluation. Surface call is supported across multiple views, but in-hand angled lighting could shift the outcome between a top-end 9 and low-end 10.

Suggested next step

Worth grading if the card has strong value. BGS may offer the best chance at a 9.5-style result thanks to strong corners/edges/centering, while PSA is most likely a 9 unless the faint back line is missed. If submitting, use a fresh sleeve/card saver and avoid additional surface contact.

This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.

Likely-case and best-case estimates

Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.

PSA

Likely
9
Best case
10

BGS

Likely
9.5
Best case
10

TAG

Likely
9.5
Best case
10

Condition-only company signal: BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.

What would need to improve for the next grade?

A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in centering and surface. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering was ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Visual assessment used instead. Front appears slightly top-heavy and a touch right-leaning but comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances. Back appears essentially centered with only negligible top/bottom variance. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.

Is this card worth submitting?

The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.

Test your own costs and values

Questions about this report

What is holding back the estimate for Dorothy?

Centering and Surface are the lowest measured condition areas. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering was ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Visual assessment used instead. Front appears slightly top-heavy and a touch right-leaning but comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances. Back appears essentially centered with only negligible top/bottom variance.

How certain is this Dorothy estimate?

Confidence is medium because centering had to be assessed visually due to failed contour measurements, and flatbed scans have limitations for ultra-fine foil surface evaluation. Surface call is supported across multiple views, but in-hand angled lighting could shift the outcome between a top-end 9 and low-end 10.

What do the grade ranges on this Dorothy report mean?

The image-based ranges are PSA 8-10, BGS 9-10, TAG 9-10. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.

Does this report mean Dorothy should be submitted?

The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.

Which grading company looks strongest from this report?

BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.

These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission when the evidence-qualified panel above identifies an appropriate commercial route.

CardRevive may offer some account holders a fixed grading credit for keeping qualifying reports public. Any publication incentive is independent of the estimated grade or report content and may affect which owners choose to publish.

Share this public report

Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.

Download branded graphics

Grade your own card

Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.

Grade yours free — 3 grades included

Your privacy choices

Essential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.

Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.

Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.