AI grade estimate, not an official grade
Predicted range: 8 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
Your next step
When you are ready to act on this estimate, submit through CardRevive. Choose a professional grading service below and CardRevive will coordinate the submission as your independent grading middleman and submission partner. CardRevive operates this AI grader and the separate middleman service; the selected grading house, not CardRevive, issues the official grade.
United States
From A$172 AUD
per card
United States
From A$55 AUD
per card
Australia
From A$30 AUD
per card
United Kingdom
From A$60 AUD
per card
United States
From A$40 AUD
per card
This AI report estimates PSA, BGS and a TAG-style result. TAG is estimate-only and is not a currently listed CardRevive middleman service. PCG, ACE and CGC are available through CardRevive, but this report does not provide house-specific AI estimates for them.
Starting prices are per card in AUD and were effective 11 July 2026. CardRevive is independent and is not affiliated with the listed grading companies. Final fees and timing are confirmed before dispatch; grading turnaround excludes restoration, and restoration or grading may incur upcharges. Only the selected grading house issues the official grade, and no outcome is guaranteed.
9.5
Centering
9.5
Corners
9.5
Edges
10
Surface
Measured centering ratios
This is a very clean modern card with strong eye appeal, solid centering, and no confirmed surface damage. The only meaningful issues are a few tiny wear points at the upper corners and a couple of very small front-edge touches, which likely keep it just shy of a true top pristine result.
Dominant grade limiter
Centering and Corners and Edges are the lowest measured condition areas in this report.
[scan_artifact] Programmatic centering data was ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Visual assessment used only. Front appears slightly right-heavy but comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances; top/bottom looks very close to centered. Back also appears slightly right-heavy with balanced top/bottom presentation. No visible diamond cut or meaningful skew.
Overall corners present sharp and clean. There is consistent evidence of tiny tip contact/softness at the upper corners, stronger on the front top-left/top-right and faintly mirrored on the back upper corners. Lower corners look clean, and the light outlines seen around some corners are predominantly [scan_artifact] rather than true whitening.
Edges are overall crisp. Two small localized wear points are visible on the front: a tiny top-edge touch and a very minor right-edge nick. The rest of the apparent light edging, especially on the back's dark border, behaves like scanner contrast rather than true whitening or chipping.
Surface appears clean front and back. I do not see a specific, traceable scratch or indentation supported across the appropriate views. Processed-view signals are not corroborated strongly enough to classify as wear.
Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 9.5, edges 9.5, surface 10. The weakest anchoring condition area is corners, edges at 9.5, anchoring the grade at 9. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 9; our predicted range: 8-10, likely 9.
Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9.5, corners 9.5, edges 9.5, surface 10. The weakest anchoring area is centering, corners, edges at 9.5. Because multiple anchoring subgrades share the lowest score, the BGS final equals that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 9.5; our predicted range: 9-10, likely 9.5.
Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 950, corners 950, edges 950, surface 1000. The weakest anchoring area is centering, corners, edges at 950. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 950; our predicted range: 900-1000, likely 950.
Confidence is moderate because the scan set lacks contour/boundary and edge-strip close-up views, and programmatic centering failed. Surface confidence is reasonably good, but corner/edge calls at this level rely on subtle visual evidence from the provided processed views.
Worth grading if the card has strong value or collector demand. PSA is a realistic Mint 9 candidate; BGS may be the most favorable on paper with a likely 9.5-style outcome. Sleeve carefully and avoid additional edge/corner handling before submission.
This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.
Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.
Condition-only company signal: BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in centering and corners and edges. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering data was ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Visual assessment used only. Front appears slightly right-heavy but comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances; top/bottom looks very close to centered. Back also appears slightly right-heavy with balanced top/bottom presentation. No visible diamond cut or meaningful skew. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
Test your own costs and valuesThe report mentions presentation wear that a card-restoration specialist could assess. Some wear is permanent, and no treatment should be assumed to raise an official grade.
Ask CardRevive about a specialist assessmentCentering and Corners and Edges are the lowest measured condition areas. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering data was ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Visual assessment used only. Front appears slightly right-heavy but comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances; top/bottom looks very close to centered. Back also appears slightly right-heavy with balanced top/bottom presentation. No visible diamond cut or meaningful skew.
Confidence is moderate because the scan set lacks contour/boundary and edge-strip close-up views, and programmatic centering failed. Surface confidence is reasonably good, but corner/edge calls at this level rely on subtle visual evidence from the provided processed views.
The image-based ranges are PSA 8-10, BGS 9-10, TAG 9-10. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission for the professional services listed above.
Graded 18 March 2026
Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.
Download branded graphics
Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.
Grade yours free — 3 grades includedEssential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.
Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.
Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.