Uta

One Piece Card Game Extra Booster / Memorial Collection #EB03-061 SECfull_artonepiece

AI grade estimate, not an official grade

Uta front
Uta back

Grade Estimates

PSA
9-10
GEM MINT

Predicted range: 9 - 10

BECKETT GRADING
9.5-10

Predicted range: 9.5 - 10

TAG GRADING · ESTIMATE
9-10
GEM MINT

Predicted range: 9 - 10

No paid service recommended

Best next step

Permanent or structural findings make a restoration referral inappropriate for this public report.

Test grading costs and value

Subgrade Breakdown

9.5

Centering

10

Corners

10

Edges

10

Surface

Measured centering ratios

Front L/R
51/49
Front T/B
52/48
Back L/R
50/50
Back T/B
51/49

Why this card received this estimate

This Uta SEC presents as a very clean, high-end copy with strong visual centering and no clearly provable wear on corners, edges, or surface. The apparent perimeter lightness is consistent with scanner contrast rather than true whitening, and no distinct scratch, dent, or ding is confirmed across the processed views.

Dominant grade limiter

Centering is the lowest measured condition area in this report.

Condition observations

Centering

9.5

Visual assessment only — measurement override used because programmatic centering confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Front appears well-centered with a very slight top-heavier/left-heavier presentation but still comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances. Back appears essentially centered with strong symmetry and no visible diamond cut.

Corners

10

All four front and back corners present sharp, consistent geometry. No corner wear is definitively supported across original, edge detection, inverted, and close-up views; apparent light rims are best classified as scanner contrast rather than true cardboard exposure.

Edges

10

Edges appear crisp and intact on both sides. No localized edge wear, chipping, notching, or layering is confirmed across original, edge detection, inverted, and edge-map views; visible perimeter light lines are consistent with scan/background contrast.

Surface

10

Surface presents clean overall on both sides. No concrete wear-based surface defect is proven across the required multiple views; any visible lines/noise are attributable to manufacturing print characteristics or scan-processing artifacts rather than post-production damage.

How the company estimates differ

PSA estimate

Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 10, edges 10, surface 10. The weakest anchoring condition area is corners, edges, surface at 10, anchoring the grade at 10. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 10; our predicted range: 9-10, likely 10.

BGS estimate

Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9.5, corners 10, edges 10, surface 10. The weakest anchoring area is centering at 9.5. Because only one anchoring subgrade is lowest, the BGS final can be at most 0.5 above that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 10; our predicted range: 9.5-10, likely 10.

TAG estimate

Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 950, corners 1000, edges 1000, surface 1000. The weakest anchoring area is centering at 950. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 1000; our predicted range: 950-1000, likely 1000.

Scan confidence: medium

Confidence is reduced by the absence of contour-guided centering measurements and by the limitations of flatbed-style scans for detecting microscopic surface defects. Within those limitations, the card looks clean across all supplied views.

Suggested next step

Worth grading. PSA is the strongest target for maximizing top-grade odds, while BGS is viable but more centering-sensitive for a top-tier label. If submitting for premium value, this looks like a solid PSA 10 candidate.

This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.

Likely-case and best-case estimates

Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.

PSA

Likely
10
Best case
10

BGS

Likely
10
Best case
10

TAG

Likely
10
Best case
10

What would need to improve for the next grade?

A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in centering. Visual assessment only — measurement override used because programmatic centering confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Front appears well-centered with a very slight top-heavier/left-heavier presentation but still comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances. Back appears essentially centered with strong symmetry and no visible diamond cut. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.

Is this card worth submitting?

The highest likely-case AI estimate here is PSA 10. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.

Test your own costs and values

Questions about this report

What is holding back the estimate for Uta?

Centering is the lowest measured condition area. Visual assessment only — measurement override used because programmatic centering confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Front appears well-centered with a very slight top-heavier/left-heavier presentation but still comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances. Back appears essentially centered with strong symmetry and no visible diamond cut.

How certain is this Uta estimate?

Confidence is reduced by the absence of contour-guided centering measurements and by the limitations of flatbed-style scans for detecting microscopic surface defects. Within those limitations, the card looks clean across all supplied views.

What do the grade ranges on this Uta report mean?

The image-based ranges are PSA 9-10, BGS 9.5-10, TAG 9-10. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.

Does this report mean Uta should be submitted?

The highest likely-case AI estimate here is PSA 10. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.

Which grading company looks strongest from this report?

No current CardRevive middleman house has a uniquely higher matching estimate in this report, so the scores alone do not support a single-house recommendation. TAG remains an estimate-only reference, while PCG, ACE and CGC are not estimated by this report.

These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission when the evidence-qualified panel above identifies an appropriate commercial route.

CardRevive may offer some account holders a fixed grading credit for keeping qualifying reports public. Any publication incentive is independent of the estimated grade or report content and may affect which owners choose to publish.

Share this public report

Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.

Download branded graphics

Grade your own card

Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.

Grade yours free — 3 grades included

Your privacy choices

Essential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.

Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.

Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.