AI grade estimate, not an official grade
Predicted range: 9 - 10
Predicted range: 9.5 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
Your next step
When you are ready to act on this estimate, submit through CardRevive. Choose a professional grading service below and CardRevive will coordinate the submission as your independent grading middleman and submission partner. CardRevive operates this AI grader and the separate middleman service; the selected grading house, not CardRevive, issues the official grade.
United States
From A$172 AUD
per card
United States
From A$55 AUD
per card
Australia
From A$30 AUD
per card
United Kingdom
From A$60 AUD
per card
United States
From A$40 AUD
per card
This AI report estimates PSA, BGS and a TAG-style result. TAG is estimate-only and is not a currently listed CardRevive middleman service. PCG, ACE and CGC are available through CardRevive, but this report does not provide house-specific AI estimates for them.
Starting prices are per card in AUD and were effective 11 July 2026. CardRevive is independent and is not affiliated with the listed grading companies. Final fees and timing are confirmed before dispatch; grading turnaround excludes restoration, and restoration or grading may incur upcharges. Only the selected grading house issues the official grade, and no outcome is guaranteed.
9.5
Centering
10
Corners
10
Edges
10
Surface
Measured centering ratios
This Uta SEC presents as a very clean, high-end copy with strong visual centering and no clearly provable wear on corners, edges, or surface. The apparent perimeter lightness is consistent with scanner contrast rather than true whitening, and no distinct scratch, dent, or ding is confirmed across the processed views.
Dominant grade limiter
Centering is the lowest measured condition area in this report.
Visual assessment only — measurement override used because programmatic centering confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Front appears well-centered with a very slight top-heavier/left-heavier presentation but still comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances. Back appears essentially centered with strong symmetry and no visible diamond cut.
All four front and back corners present sharp, consistent geometry. No corner wear is definitively supported across original, edge detection, inverted, and close-up views; apparent light rims are best classified as scanner contrast rather than true cardboard exposure.
Edges appear crisp and intact on both sides. No localized edge wear, chipping, notching, or layering is confirmed across original, edge detection, inverted, and edge-map views; visible perimeter light lines are consistent with scan/background contrast.
Surface presents clean overall on both sides. No concrete wear-based surface defect is proven across the required multiple views; any visible lines/noise are attributable to manufacturing print characteristics or scan-processing artifacts rather than post-production damage.
Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 10, edges 10, surface 10. The weakest anchoring condition area is corners, edges, surface at 10, anchoring the grade at 10. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 10; our predicted range: 9-10, likely 10.
Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9.5, corners 10, edges 10, surface 10. The weakest anchoring area is centering at 9.5. Because only one anchoring subgrade is lowest, the BGS final can be at most 0.5 above that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 10; our predicted range: 9.5-10, likely 10.
Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 950, corners 1000, edges 1000, surface 1000. The weakest anchoring area is centering at 950. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 1000; our predicted range: 950-1000, likely 1000.
Confidence is reduced by the absence of contour-guided centering measurements and by the limitations of flatbed-style scans for detecting microscopic surface defects. Within those limitations, the card looks clean across all supplied views.
Worth grading. PSA is the strongest target for maximizing top-grade odds, while BGS is viable but more centering-sensitive for a top-tier label. If submitting for premium value, this looks like a solid PSA 10 candidate.
This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.
Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.
A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in centering. Visual assessment only — measurement override used because programmatic centering confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Front appears well-centered with a very slight top-heavier/left-heavier presentation but still comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances. Back appears essentially centered with strong symmetry and no visible diamond cut. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is PSA 10. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
Test your own costs and valuesThe report mentions presentation wear that a card-restoration specialist could assess. Some wear is permanent, and no treatment should be assumed to raise an official grade.
Ask CardRevive about a specialist assessmentCentering is the lowest measured condition area. Visual assessment only — measurement override used because programmatic centering confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Front appears well-centered with a very slight top-heavier/left-heavier presentation but still comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances. Back appears essentially centered with strong symmetry and no visible diamond cut.
Confidence is reduced by the absence of contour-guided centering measurements and by the limitations of flatbed-style scans for detecting microscopic surface defects. Within those limitations, the card looks clean across all supplied views.
The image-based ranges are PSA 9-10, BGS 9.5-10, TAG 9-10. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is PSA 10. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
No current CardRevive middleman house has a uniquely higher matching estimate in this report, so the scores alone do not support a single-house recommendation. TAG remains an estimate-only reference, while PCG, ACE and CGC are not estimated by this report.
These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission for the professional services listed above.
Graded 18 March 2026
Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.
Download branded graphics
Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.
Grade yours free — 3 grades includedEssential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.
Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.
Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.