AI grade estimate, not an official grade
Predicted range: 7 - 9
Predicted range: 8.5 - 9.5
Predicted range: 8 - 9
Your next step
When you are ready to act on this estimate, submit through CardRevive. Choose a professional grading service below and CardRevive will coordinate the submission as your independent grading middleman and submission partner. CardRevive operates this AI grader and the separate middleman service; the selected grading house, not CardRevive, issues the official grade.
United States
From A$172 AUD
per card
United States
From A$55 AUD
per card
Australia
From A$30 AUD
per card
United Kingdom
From A$60 AUD
per card
United States
From A$40 AUD
per card
This AI report estimates PSA, BGS and a TAG-style result. TAG is estimate-only and is not a currently listed CardRevive middleman service. PCG, ACE and CGC are available through CardRevive, but this report does not provide house-specific AI estimates for them.
Starting prices are per card in AUD and were effective 11 July 2026. CardRevive is independent and is not affiliated with the listed grading companies. Final fees and timing are confirmed before dispatch; grading turnaround excludes restoration, and restoration or grading may incur upcharges. Only the selected grading house issues the official grade, and no outcome is guaranteed.
9.5
Centering
9
Corners
9
Edges
8.5
Surface
Measured centering ratios
This is an attractive copy with strong eye appeal, solid centering, and generally clean structure. The main issues are a visible front holo surface scratch/line plus several minor corner and edge touches, which place it in the NM-MT to Mint range rather than Gem Mint.
Dominant grade limiter
Surface is the lowest measured condition area in this report.
Programmatic centering was ignored due to 0.00 confidence and borderless-card note. Visual assessment used instead. Front appears slightly right-heavy and a touch bottom-heavy but comfortably within Gem Mint tolerance. Back appears well centered overall with only minor top/bottom shift. No obvious diamond cut seen.
Corners show multiple minor touches rather than one isolated flaw. They remain square and present strongly, but several corners—especially back top-left/back bottom-right and front bottom-right—show enough real wear to keep corners out of pristine territory.
Edges are generally strong but not flawless. Real wear is limited to a handful of small, localized nicks/white specks rather than full-edge chipping. Uniform border contrast effects on the left side were treated as scan artifact per the boundary guidance.
Surface is the limiting category. The front holo shows one clear, identifiable scratch/line that is stronger than normal holo scanner interference, and the back has light handling-level surface wear. No evidence of major crease, indentation, or staining.
Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 9, edges 9, surface 8.5. The weakest anchoring condition area is surface at 8.5, anchoring the grade at 8. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 8; our predicted range: 7-9, likely 8.
Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9.5, corners 9, edges 9, surface 8.5. The weakest anchoring area is surface at 8.5. Because only one anchoring subgrade is lowest, the BGS final can be at most 0.5 above that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 9; our predicted range: 8.5-9.5, likely 9.
Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 950, corners 900, edges 900, surface 850. The weakest anchoring area is surface at 850. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 900; our predicted range: 850-950, likely 900.
Confidence is moderate because the scan set is good and includes multiple processed views, but surface grading on holographic cards is inherently limited by flatbed scan artifacts and diffuse lighting. The identified front holo line appears real enough to penalize, but ultra-fine micro-scratches may still be under- or over-represented by scans.
Worth grading if the card has strong raw value and you are comfortable with an expected mid-high grade rather than a top pop result. PSA is likely the most forgiving path for resale familiarity, while BGS/TAG are likely to expose the surface issue more explicitly.
This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.
Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.
Condition-only company signal: BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in surface. Surface is the limiting category. The front holo shows one clear, identifiable scratch/line that is stronger than normal holo scanner interference, and the back has light handling-level surface wear. No evidence of major crease, indentation, or staining. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
Test your own costs and valuesSurface is the lowest measured condition area. Surface is the limiting category. The front holo shows one clear, identifiable scratch/line that is stronger than normal holo scanner interference, and the back has light handling-level surface wear. No evidence of major crease, indentation, or staining.
Confidence is moderate because the scan set is good and includes multiple processed views, but surface grading on holographic cards is inherently limited by flatbed scan artifacts and diffuse lighting. The identified front holo line appears real enough to penalize, but ultra-fine micro-scratches may still be under- or over-represented by scans.
The image-based ranges are PSA 7-9, BGS 8.5-9.5, TAG 8-9. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission for the professional services listed above.
Graded 18 March 2026
Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.
Download branded graphics
Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.
Grade yours free — 3 grades includedEssential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.
Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.
Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.