AI grade estimate, not an official grade
Predicted range: 8 - 10
Predicted range: 8.5 - 9.5
Predicted range: 8 - 9
Your next step
When you are ready to act on this estimate, submit through CardRevive. Choose a professional grading service below and CardRevive will coordinate the submission as your independent grading middleman and submission partner. CardRevive operates this AI grader and the separate middleman service; the selected grading house, not CardRevive, issues the official grade.
United States
From A$172 AUD
per card
United States
From A$55 AUD
per card
Australia
From A$30 AUD
per card
United Kingdom
From A$60 AUD
per card
United States
From A$40 AUD
per card
This AI report estimates PSA, BGS and a TAG-style result. TAG is estimate-only and is not a currently listed CardRevive middleman service. PCG, ACE and CGC are available through CardRevive, but this report does not provide house-specific AI estimates for them.
Starting prices are per card in AUD and were effective 11 July 2026. CardRevive is independent and is not affiliated with the listed grading companies. Final fees and timing are confirmed before dispatch; grading turnaround excludes restoration, and restoration or grading may incur upcharges. Only the selected grading house issues the official grade, and no outcome is guaranteed.
9.5
Centering
9
Corners
9
Edges
9.5
Surface
Measured centering ratios
This card presents as a strong Mint copy with very good eye appeal and solid centering on both sides. The main limiting issue is a small front top-right corner/edge touch, plus tiny back surface specking, while the rest of the card appears clean within scan limitations. It is a high-grade candidate, but not a clear no-doubt Gem Mint 10 from the provided views.
Dominant grade limiter
Corners and Edges are the lowest measured condition areas in this report.
[scan_artifact] Programmatic centering was ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Visual assessment used instead. Front appears slightly right-heavy and slightly bottom-heavy but comfortably within Gem Mint tolerances. Back appears very well centered with only minor top/bottom variance.
Overall corners are strong and mostly sharp. One minor [wear] touch/softening is present at the front top-right corner; the remaining corners look clean, with most apparent brightness at tips better explained by [scan_artifact] from dark borders and lighting.
Edges are generally clean. There is one small real [wear] issue concentrated near the front top-right/top edge area; the rest of the apparent edge brightness on this dark-bordered front is more consistent with [scan_artifact] than actual whitening or chipping.
Surface presents very well overall. Front appears clean within scan limitations, while the back shows a tiny localized spot/speck or two that count as minor wear-level surface flaws but not enough to drop the card out of Mint/Gem Mint territory for most companies.
Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 9, edges 9, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring condition area is corners, edges at 9, anchoring the grade at 9. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 9; our predicted range: 8-10, likely 9.
Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9.5, corners 9, edges 9, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring area is corners, edges at 9. Because multiple anchoring subgrades share the lowest score, the BGS final equals that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 9; our predicted range: 8.5-9.5, likely 9.
Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 950, corners 900, edges 900, surface 950. The weakest anchoring area is corners, edges at 900. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 900; our predicted range: 850-950, likely 900.
Confidence is limited because the provided set lacks true contour overlays and edge-strip close-ups, and several views are strongly affected by dark-border contrast and holo/texture noise. Surface assessment on textured/holo cards from flat images always has some uncertainty, but the top-right wear signal is supported across multiple views.
Worth grading if the card has value and if this is a legitimate/desired issue or custom collectible. PSA 9 or BGS 9.0 is the most realistic expectation. If submitting for the best chance at a top label despite small defects, PSA is likely more forgiving than BGS or TAG.
This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.
Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.
A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in corners and edges. Overall corners are strong and mostly sharp. One minor [wear] touch/softening is present at the front top-right corner; the remaining corners look clean, with most apparent brightness at tips better explained by [scan_artifact] from dark borders and lighting. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is PSA 9. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
Test your own costs and valuesThe report mentions presentation wear that a card-restoration specialist could assess. Some wear is permanent, and no treatment should be assumed to raise an official grade.
Ask CardRevive about a specialist assessmentCorners and Edges are the lowest measured condition areas. Overall corners are strong and mostly sharp. One minor [wear] touch/softening is present at the front top-right corner; the remaining corners look clean, with most apparent brightness at tips better explained by [scan_artifact] from dark borders and lighting.
Confidence is limited because the provided set lacks true contour overlays and edge-strip close-ups, and several views are strongly affected by dark-border contrast and holo/texture noise. Surface assessment on textured/holo cards from flat images always has some uncertainty, but the top-right wear signal is supported across multiple views.
The image-based ranges are PSA 8-10, BGS 8.5-9.5, TAG 8-9. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is PSA 9. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
No current CardRevive middleman house has a uniquely higher matching estimate in this report, so the scores alone do not support a single-house recommendation. TAG remains an estimate-only reference, while PCG, ACE and CGC are not estimated by this report.
These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission for the professional services listed above.
Graded 18 March 2026
Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.
Download branded graphics
Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.
Grade yours free — 3 grades includedEssential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.
Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.
Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.