AI grade estimate, not an official grade
Predicted range: 8 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
Your next step
When you are ready to act on this estimate, submit through CardRevive. Choose a professional grading service below and CardRevive will coordinate the submission as your independent grading middleman and submission partner. CardRevive operates this AI grader and the separate middleman service; the selected grading house, not CardRevive, issues the official grade.
United States
From A$172 AUD
per card
United States
From A$55 AUD
per card
Australia
From A$30 AUD
per card
United Kingdom
From A$60 AUD
per card
United States
From A$40 AUD
per card
This AI report estimates PSA, BGS and a TAG-style result. TAG is estimate-only and is not a currently listed CardRevive middleman service. PCG, ACE and CGC are available through CardRevive, but this report does not provide house-specific AI estimates for them.
Starting prices are per card in AUD and were effective 11 July 2026. CardRevive is independent and is not affiliated with the listed grading companies. Final fees and timing are confirmed before dispatch; grading turnaround excludes restoration, and restoration or grading may incur upcharges. Only the selected grading house issues the official grade, and no outcome is guaranteed.
9.5
Centering
9.5
Corners
9.5
Edges
10
Surface
Measured centering ratios
This is a strong, high-grade candidate with excellent eye appeal, very clean surfaces, and well-balanced centering on both sides. The only clear wear visible in the provided scans is a tiny touch at the front bottom-left corner/lower-left edge area. Everything else that looks busy is typical holo texture, foil reflectivity, or scan processing noise.
Dominant grade limiter
Centering and Corners and Edges are the lowest measured condition areas in this report.
[scan_artifact] Programmatic centering ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. [manufacturing] Full-art layout reduces traditional border-reference cues, so visual alignment to the physical card edge was used. Front appears very well centered with only a slight left-right favor; top-bottom also appears essentially centered. Back blue border frame appears balanced left-right and near-even top-bottom.
Overall corners are strong. One small confirmed [wear] touch is present at the front bottom-left corner; the remaining apparent light rims are consistent with [scan_artifact] from scanner contrast and foil edge reflectivity rather than true corner degradation.
Edges present very well overall. One minor [wear] nick is visible on the front lower-left edge area; otherwise the card shows mostly [scan_artifact] edge halos typical of foil/full-art scans and no meaningful structural chipping or roughness.
No confirmed surface wear detected on either side within scan limitations. The front holo presentation shows normal [manufacturing] texture and scanner interaction, but there is no cross-supported [wear] scratch, indentation, crease, or stain.
Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 9.5, edges 9.5, surface 10. The weakest anchoring condition area is corners, edges at 9.5, anchoring the grade at 9. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 9; our predicted range: 8-10, likely 9.
Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9.5, corners 9.5, edges 9.5, surface 10. The weakest anchoring area is centering, corners, edges at 9.5. Because multiple anchoring subgrades share the lowest score, the BGS final equals that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 9.5; our predicted range: 9-10, likely 9.5.
Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 950, corners 950, edges 950, surface 1000. The weakest anchoring area is centering, corners, edges at 950. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 950; our predicted range: 900-1000, likely 950.
Confidence is reduced slightly because centering measurements failed and because foil/full-art surfaces generate scanner artifacts that can mimic wear. Confidence is stronger on the lower-left corner/edge touch because it is visible in the original and supported by close-up context, while other suspected issues are not consistently supported across proof views.
Worth grading. PSA is still viable but most likely lands at 9 due to the single minor wear point; BGS may present best if you value subgrades and are comfortable with a likely 9.5 profile. Submit only if the lower-left touch is acceptable relative to the card's value, as otherwise this is a very attractive copy.
This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.
Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.
Condition-only company signal: BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in centering and corners and edges. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. [manufacturing] Full-art layout reduces traditional border-reference cues, so visual alignment to the physical card edge was used. Front appears very well centered with only a slight left-right favor; top-bottom also appears essentially centered. Back blue border frame appears balanced left-right and near-even top-bottom. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
Test your own costs and valuesCentering and Corners and Edges are the lowest measured condition areas. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. [manufacturing] Full-art layout reduces traditional border-reference cues, so visual alignment to the physical card edge was used. Front appears very well centered with only a slight left-right favor; top-bottom also appears essentially centered. Back blue border frame appears balanced left-right and near-even top-bottom.
Confidence is reduced slightly because centering measurements failed and because foil/full-art surfaces generate scanner artifacts that can mimic wear. Confidence is stronger on the lower-left corner/edge touch because it is visible in the original and supported by close-up context, while other suspected issues are not consistently supported across proof views.
The image-based ranges are PSA 8-10, BGS 9-10, TAG 9-10. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission for the professional services listed above.
Graded 18 March 2026
Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.
Download branded graphics
Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.
Grade yours free — 3 grades includedEssential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.
Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.
Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.