AI grade estimate, not an official grade
Predicted range: 8 - 10
Predicted range: 8.5 - 9.5
Predicted range: 8 - 9
No paid service recommended
Permanent or structural findings make a restoration referral inappropriate for this public report.
Test grading costs and value9
Centering
9.5
Corners
9
Edges
9.5
Surface
Measured centering ratios
This card presents well at first glance, with strong eye appeal and solid centering. Closer review shows multiple light corner touches, scattered edge chipping on the dark front border, and a small back surface mark/spotting area, which collectively place it below mint-gem levels. It is a clean mid-high grade copy rather than a top-pop candidate.
Dominant grade limiter
Centering and Edges are the lowest measured condition areas in this report.
[scan_artifact] Programmatic centering was ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. [manufacturing] Front is full-art/border-light design, so centering judged visually from frame spacing and content placement only. Front appears well centered overall with only slight top-heaviness and near-even left/right balance. Back shows visibly wider left border than right, approximately 58/42 left-right, with top/bottom remaining comfortably within premium tolerances.
Front corners show light, real corner touches at multiple tips, most notably top-right and bottom-left/top-left at a very minor level. No heavy whitening, splitting, bends, or severe rounding seen. Back corners appear clean in the usable views; the provided back corner close-up composite is not reliable for direct assessment, so no unsupported defects were called.
Both sides show genuine light edge wear, more noticeable on the front because the dark border makes tiny chips stand out. The wear is localized and asymmetric, supported by original, edge detection, inverted, and edge-map patterns, so this is true wear rather than dark-border contrast. No dents, layering, or severe chipping observed.
Front surface appears clean within scan limitations, with no proven post-production scratching or indenting. Back surface has a small pair of visible dark marks near the Poké Ball area that constitute minor surface wear/spotting. Overall surface remains strong but not flawless.
Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 9.5, edges 9, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring condition area is edges at 9, anchoring the grade at 9. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 9; our predicted range: 8-10, likely 9.
Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9, corners 9.5, edges 9, surface 9.5. The weakest anchoring area is centering, edges at 9. Because multiple anchoring subgrades share the lowest score, the BGS final equals that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 9; our predicted range: 8.5-9.5, likely 9.
Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 900, corners 950, edges 900, surface 950. The weakest anchoring area is centering, edges at 900. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 900; our predicted range: 850-950, likely 900.
Confidence is moderate because the card appears to be photographed on textured fabric rather than scanned, processed views amplify background texture, and the back corner close-up composite is not usable for direct corner confirmation. Still, the key wear findings are supported across multiple views.
Condition-wise this is more of an 8/8.5-level submission than a 9/10 target. If submitting, BGS may provide the most informative result through subgrades, while PSA would likely be the easiest market-facing holder if authenticity of the card itself were not a concern. Verify authenticity before grading, as the card appears custom/non-official.
This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.
Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.
A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in centering and edges. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering was ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. [manufacturing] Front is full-art/border-light design, so centering judged visually from frame spacing and content placement only. Front appears well centered overall with only slight top-heaviness and near-even left/right balance. Back shows visibly wider left border than right, approximately 58/42 left-right, with top/bottom remaining comfortably within premium tolerances. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is PSA 9. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
Test your own costs and valuesCentering and Edges are the lowest measured condition areas. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering was ignored because confidence was 0.00 on both sides. [manufacturing] Front is full-art/border-light design, so centering judged visually from frame spacing and content placement only. Front appears well centered overall with only slight top-heaviness and near-even left/right balance. Back shows visibly wider left border than right, approximately 58/42 left-right, with top/bottom remaining comfortably within premium tolerances.
Confidence is moderate because the card appears to be photographed on textured fabric rather than scanned, processed views amplify background texture, and the back corner close-up composite is not usable for direct corner confirmation. Still, the key wear findings are supported across multiple views.
The image-based ranges are PSA 8-10, BGS 8.5-9.5, TAG 8-9. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is PSA 9. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
No current CardRevive middleman house has a uniquely higher matching estimate in this report, so the scores alone do not support a single-house recommendation. TAG remains an estimate-only reference, while PCG, ACE and CGC are not estimated by this report.
These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission when the evidence-qualified panel above identifies an appropriate commercial route.
CardRevive may offer some account holders a fixed grading credit for keeping qualifying reports public. Any publication incentive is independent of the estimated grade or report content and may affect which owners choose to publish.
Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.
Download branded graphics
Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.
Grade yours free — 3 grades includedEssential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.
Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.
Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.