AI grade estimate, not an official grade
Predicted range: 8 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
Predicted range: 9 - 10
No paid service recommended
Permanent or structural findings make a restoration referral inappropriate for this public report.
Test grading costs and value9.5
Centering
9.5
Corners
9.5
Edges
10
Surface
Measured centering ratios
This is a strong high-grade copy with clean surfaces, sharp overall presentation, and visually solid centering on both sides. The only confirmed wear is a tiny front top-right corner/upper-right edge touch, which is enough to separate it from a true flawless top-pop candidate. Everything else appears clean or attributable to foil texture and scan behavior.
Dominant grade limiter
Centering and Corners and Edges are the lowest measured condition areas in this report.
[scan_artifact] Programmatic centering was ignored because contour confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Visual assessment used instead. Front appears well-centered with slightly narrower right border and slightly narrower bottom border, comfortably within top-tier tolerances. Back appears a bit more right-heavy and bottom-heavy than the front but still within PSA/BGS/TAG gem-level tolerance.
All corners are sharp overall. One genuine minor front top-right corner touch is the only confirmed wear defect; the remaining corner light fringes are not supported as real damage and are treated as scan/contrast effects.
Edges present clean overall on both sides. The only confirmed wear is a tiny nick associated with the front upper-right edge/corner area; no additional edge chipping, fraying, denting, or layering is supported across multiple views.
No confirmed wear-based surface defects on either side. The card's textured/foil finish creates substantial processing noise, but there is no three-view-supported evidence of scratches, dents, creases, staining, or surface breaks.
Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 9.5, edges 9.5, surface 10. The weakest anchoring condition area is corners, edges at 9.5, anchoring the grade at 9. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 10 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 9; our predicted range: 8-10, likely 9.
Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9.5, corners 9.5, edges 9.5, surface 10. The weakest anchoring area is centering, corners, edges at 9.5. Because multiple anchoring subgrades share the lowest score, the BGS final equals that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 9.5; our predicted range: 9-10, likely 9.5.
Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 950, corners 950, edges 950, surface 1000. The weakest anchoring area is centering, corners, edges at 950. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 950; our predicted range: 900-1000, likely 950.
Confidence is reduced slightly because programmatic centering failed and this is a textured foil/full-art card, which creates scanner noise and reflective ambiguity in processed views. Confidence is still decent because the main wear call is supported across multiple views and no other defects are consistently corroborated.
Worth grading if the goal is a premium Mint/Gem Mint result. PSA is the safest expectation at 9, while BGS offers a realistic shot at 9.5 due to subgrades and strong surface quality. If chasing a straight 10, this copy is risky because the small upper-right touch is likely to be noticed.
This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.
Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.
Condition-only company signal: BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in centering and corners and edges. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering was ignored because contour confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Visual assessment used instead. Front appears well-centered with slightly narrower right border and slightly narrower bottom border, comfortably within top-tier tolerances. Back appears a bit more right-heavy and bottom-heavy than the front but still within PSA/BGS/TAG gem-level tolerance. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
Test your own costs and valuesCentering and Corners and Edges are the lowest measured condition areas. [scan_artifact] Programmatic centering was ignored because contour confidence was 0.00 on both sides. Visual assessment used instead. Front appears well-centered with slightly narrower right border and slightly narrower bottom border, comfortably within top-tier tolerances. Back appears a bit more right-heavy and bottom-heavy than the front but still within PSA/BGS/TAG gem-level tolerance.
Confidence is reduced slightly because programmatic centering failed and this is a textured foil/full-art card, which creates scanner noise and reflective ambiguity in processed views. Confidence is still decent because the main wear call is supported across multiple views and no other defects are consistently corroborated.
The image-based ranges are PSA 8-10, BGS 9-10, TAG 9-10. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.
The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 9.5. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.
BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.
These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission when the evidence-qualified panel above identifies an appropriate commercial route.
CardRevive may offer some account holders a fixed grading credit for keeping qualifying reports public. Any publication incentive is independent of the estimated grade or report content and may affect which owners choose to publish.
Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.
Download branded graphics
Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.
Grade yours free — 3 grades includedEssential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.
Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.
Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.