Alakazam

Pokémon Base Set #1/102holographicpokemon

AI grade estimate, not an official grade

Alakazam front
Alakazam back

Grade Estimates

PSA
6-8
NEAR MINT

Predicted range: 6 - 8

BECKETT GRADING
7.5-8.5

Predicted range: 7.5 - 8.5

TAG GRADING · ESTIMATE
7-8
NM-MT

Predicted range: 7 - 8

Your next step

Grade through CardRevive

When you are ready to act on this estimate, submit through CardRevive. Choose a professional grading service below and CardRevive will coordinate the submission as your independent grading middleman and submission partner. CardRevive operates this AI grader and the separate middleman service; the selected grading house, not CardRevive, issues the official grade.

  • PSA

    United States

    From A$172 AUD

    per card

  • BGS

    United States

    From A$55 AUD

    per card

  • PCG

    CardRevive exclusive

    Australia

    From A$30 AUD

    per card

  • ACE

    United Kingdom

    From A$60 AUD

    per card

  • CGC

    United States

    From A$40 AUD

    per card

This AI report estimates PSA, BGS and a TAG-style result. TAG is estimate-only and is not a currently listed CardRevive middleman service. PCG, ACE and CGC are available through CardRevive, but this report does not provide house-specific AI estimates for them.

Starting prices are per card in AUD and were effective 11 July 2026. CardRevive is independent and is not affiliated with the listed grading companies. Final fees and timing are confirmed before dispatch; grading turnaround excludes restoration, and restoration or grading may incur upcharges. Only the selected grading house issues the official grade, and no outcome is guaranteed.

Subgrade Breakdown

9

Centering

8.5

Corners

8

Edges

7.5

Surface

Measured centering ratios

Front L/R56/44
Front T/B53/47
Back L/R56/44
Back T/B52/48

Why this card received this estimate

This is a visually appealing vintage Base Set holo Alakazam with respectable centering and no major structural damage, but it has clear real wear. The main issues are scattered corner/edge whitening and noticeable front holo scratching, while the back remains comparatively clean. Overall it presents like a solid Near Mint vintage holo rather than a Mint/Gem Mint example.

Dominant grade limiter

Surface is the lowest measured condition area in this report.

Condition observations

Centering

9

[scan_artifact] Programmatic centering data was unavailable with 0.00 confidence, so measurement override applied and visual assessment used. Front appears modestly right-heavy with slightly thicker left border and near-balanced top/bottom; estimated around 56/44 L-R and 53/47 T-B. Back shows similar mild right shift, approximately 56/44 L-R and 52/48 T-B. No obvious diamond cut is apparent. Centering passes PSA 10 standards, but is short of ideal BGS Pristine-style symmetry.

Corners

8.5

All four corners show real, low-level wear rather than scan illusion; the pattern is asymmetric and supported by original, edge detection, and inverted views. Wear remains in the light-to-moderate range with no creasing, splits, or major dings, but the card is clearly not gem-mint at the corners.

Edges

8

Edge wear is the primary limiting factor. Both sides show genuine localized whitening and minor chipping/roughness, with the reverse bottom edge the most impacted area. This is more than a single tiny flaw, but still comfortably within mid-mint territory rather than heavy wear.

Surface

7.5

Front holo surface wear is meaningful and clearly exceeds mint-level expectations, while the back surface is relatively clean with only light handling scuffs. Factory holo print lines are present but not penalized. The front surface is the second major grade limiter after edges/corners.

How the company estimates differ

PSA estimate

Deterministic PSA final from locked subgrades: corners 8.5, edges 8, surface 7.5. The weakest anchoring condition area is surface at 7.5, anchoring the grade at 7. Measured centering qualifies for the PSA 9 tier. PSA final is the lower of the two: 7; our predicted range: 6-8, likely 7.

BGS estimate

Normalized from locked BGS subgrades: centering 9, corners 8.5, edges 8, surface 7.5. The weakest anchoring area is surface at 7.5. Because only one anchoring subgrade is lowest, the BGS final can be at most 0.5 above that lowest subgrade. Deterministic BGS final: 8; our predicted range: 7.5-8.5, likely 8.

TAG estimate

Estimated from our locked subgrades scaled onto TAG's 1000-point scale: centering 900, corners 850, edges 800, surface 750. The weakest anchoring area is surface at 750. This is a BGS-equivalent estimate derived from our subgrades, not a reproduction of TAG's methodology; TAG's proprietary photometric grading may score the card differently. Estimated TAG final: 800; our predicted range: 750-850, likely 800.

Scan confidence: medium

Confidence is medium because the scan set is strong for edges, corners, and general surface review, but flatbed-style imaging still limits certainty on very fine micro-scratches and exact depth of holo wear. Centering had to be estimated visually because contour-based measurements failed.

Suggested next step

Worth grading if you want an authenticated vintage holo in a respectable holder, but it is unlikely to achieve a top-tier mint grade. PSA is probably the most favorable option for market value and tolerance profile; BGS/TAG are likely to expose the edge and surface wear more harshly.

This is report guidance, not a guaranteed grading or financial outcome.

Likely-case and best-case estimates

Best case means the upper end of this image-based estimate range, not a promised official result.

PSA

Likely
7
Best case
8

BGS

Likely
8
Best case
8.5

TAG

Likely
8
Best case
8.5

Condition-only company signal: BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.

What would need to improve for the next grade?

A stronger estimate would first require better condition evidence in surface. Front holo surface wear is meaningful and clearly exceeds mint-level expectations, while the back surface is relatively clean with only light handling scuffs. Factory holo print lines are present but not penalized. The front surface is the second major grade limiter after edges/corners. A clearer scan can reduce uncertainty, but it cannot remove genuine wear or guarantee the next official grade.

Is this card worth submitting?

The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 8. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.

Test your own costs and values

Restoration opportunity to assess

The report mentions presentation wear that a card-restoration specialist could assess. Some wear is permanent, and no treatment should be assumed to raise an official grade.

Ask CardRevive about a specialist assessment

Questions about this report

What is holding back the estimate for Alakazam?

Surface is the lowest measured condition area. Front holo surface wear is meaningful and clearly exceeds mint-level expectations, while the back surface is relatively clean with only light handling scuffs. Factory holo print lines are present but not penalized. The front surface is the second major grade limiter after edges/corners.

How certain is this Alakazam estimate?

Confidence is medium because the scan set is strong for edges, corners, and general surface review, but flatbed-style imaging still limits certainty on very fine micro-scratches and exact depth of holo wear. Centering had to be estimated visually because contour-based measurements failed.

What do the grade ranges on this Alakazam report mean?

The image-based ranges are PSA 6-8, BGS 7.5-8.5, TAG 7-8. They show modeled uncertainty for this scan, not interchangeable company scales or guaranteed official grades. A physical examination can finish outside the displayed range.

Does this report mean Alakazam should be submitted?

The highest likely-case AI estimate here is BGS 8. Submitting is financially worthwhile only if the expected graded value, less grading, shipping and selling costs, exceeds the card's raw value and your risk tolerance. CardRevive does not know those market inputs from this report alone.

Which grading company looks strongest from this report?

BGS has the higher numerical likely-case estimate among the current CardRevive middleman houses this report can estimate. That condition-only comparison does not account for final fees, turnaround, authentication, resale demand or differences between company standards.

These grades are an AI estimate, not an official grade. CardRevive is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, or TAG and cannot issue official grades. A grading house makes the official authentication and slab decision. CardRevive can separately coordinate an independent middleman submission for the professional services listed above.

Graded 17 March 2026

Share this public report

Shared links use the consent-gated public report. Its canonical URL stays clean.

Download branded graphics

Grade your own card

Get PSA, BGS, and TAG estimates across centering, corners, edges, and surface. Your first 3 grades are free, no payment required.

Grade yours free — 3 grades included

Your privacy choices

Essential sign-in, security, payments and on-device grading always work.

Optional first-party analytics, Google Analytics and Ads, Meta Pixel, plus Sentry error and session replay stay off unless you accept.

Read the Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.